RSS

Category Archives: Education

Missouri FY 2013 Budget Summary

Thanks to Donna Lichtenegger for forwarding summary information on Governor Nixon’s proposed 2013 budget below:

h/t mo.govEconomists are generally predicting a slow but steady recovery for the U.S. economy which is still struggling with unemployment at 8.5%. There is a positive sign with the four-week moving average of weekly initial unemployment claims falling and stabilizing below 400,000 since November. Missouri is fairing slightly better than the national economy with unemployment currently at 8.0%. Certainly this is an improvement when compared to the record unemployment of 9.6% a year ago.

With this in mind, forecasting state revenues for Missouri’s upcoming fiscal year has been challenging. The revised Consensus Revenue Estimate (CRE) for the current FY2012 is 2.7% or $7.301 billion Net General Revenue (GR) collections. The CRE agreed to by the House, Senate and the Governor for FY2013 is for GR to grow at a less than average rate of 3.9%. This would result in Net GR collections of $7.586 billion. This amount would return tax collections available for the budget to slightly above the actual collections for FY2009. The CRE for FY2013 would provide an increase in net collections of $285 million above the original CRE that use used to craft the FY2012 budget.

However, the FY2012 budget also has more than $500 million of one-time Federal Budget Stabilization Funds that are supporting current programs, including the K 1-12 School Foundation Formula. These funds will not be available for the FY2013 budget. In addition, there are a number of mandatory increases in FY2013 which will require the commitment of GR funds such as the need for a $90 million increase in the state’s match rate for our Medicaid program.

The Governor’s proposed budget includes: carrying over funds, reductions, eliminations, cost containments, administrative savings, debt refinancing, generation of additional revenues from debt collections, other revenue efficiencies, increased Gaming fees and a tax amnesty plan. Approximately $88.7million of these enhanced revenue proposals will require additions and/or changes to current state statutes.

The Governor’s FY2013 budget is balanced through the following components:

  • $191.7 million savings through efficiencies and reallocations in the Medicaid program
  • $89.0 million reduction for 4-year higher education institutions. This is a 14% decrease from the appropriations for FY2012
  • $64.3 million in additional debt collections and other revenue efficiencies
  • $51.8 million increase from a tax amnesty plan
  • $41.0 million savings through debt restructuring
  • $29.3 million in reduced staff and administrative costs in state agencies
  • $16.9 million reduction for community and technical colleges, also a 14% decrease from the appropriations for FY2012
  • $15.0 million in additional lottery revenue through advertising and other Lottery Commission initiatives
  • $7.0 million reduction in biodiesel subsidy payments
  • $2.0 million reduction in local public health agency grants

Items that are prioritized in the Governor’s FY2013 budget include:

  • $3.009 billion for the Foundation Formula, including an overall increase of $5.0 million with a General Revenue increase of $203.2 million needed in part to also offset lost Federal Budget Stabilization Funds
  • $99.8 million to provide funding for K-12 transportation at the same level allowed after the Governor’s $8.0 million expenditure restriction in FY2012 appropriation
  • $105.5 million to maintain available funding for the A+, Bright Flight, and Access MO Scholarship Programs, including a general revenue increase of $25.0 million to partially offset the loss of MOHELA funds
  • $23.6 million for a 2% salary increase for state employees, effective January 1, 2013
  • $14.9 million to maintain funding for the Customized Jobs Training Program
  • $4.0 million for innovations in science and technology as authorized in the Missouri Science and Innovation Reinvestment Act
  • $31.0 million of increased gaming fees to provide a more stable revenue source for the state’s seven veteran’s homes
 
Leave a comment

Posted by on February 3, 2012 in Economy, Education, Taxes

 

Tags: , , ,

Blueprint For Missouri

The Rockin’ Conservative kept hearing about a “Blueprint for Missouri” but had little luck finding any details on the plan.  We now have the bullet points!  Thanks Donna Lichtenegger.

Blueprint for Missouri

 Protecting Missouri Taxpayers

  • Balanced budget with no new taxes
  • County and school debt disclosure bill
  • Taxpayer Protection Act
  • Criminal justice reform

Creation [Sic] Missouri Jobs

  • Workers Compensation and Second Injury Fund Reform
  • Employment Law Reform
  • Missouri Entrepreneur Virtual Resource Network
  • Prevailing wage reform
  • Tort reform
    • Joint & several
    • Loser pays

Reforming Missouri Schools

  • Foundation formula fix
  • Turner Fix and tuition tax credits for unaccredited districts
  • Teacher Quality Act
  • Charter school expansion

Defending Missouri Values

  • Pro-life conscience bills
  • Review of Missouri’s Mandatory reporter law
  • Expanded college savings plans
  • Driver’s license in English
  • Voter ID
  • Veterans Home funding

Would be wonderful to update MOGOP.org with this list, more details, and links to the related bills.

 
1 Comment

Posted by on January 30, 2012 in Economy, Education, Republican, Taxes

 

Tags: , ,

New Bloomfield School Board Too Busy…

…voting on issues unrelated to education to improve the education at their schools.

h/t http://jennysironmanquest.blogspot.com/

As you know the Rockin’ Conservative believes that state, local, and federal revenues should be gathered through taxation of consumption — not the myriad of income, realty, and personal property taxes currently employed.

To that end, the Rockin’ Conservative has joined on with United For Missouri and Let The Voters Decide to enact a Citizens Initiative Petition abolishing Personal Income Taxes in favor of a Consumption Tax.

Today, we find out that the New Bloomfield School Board will vote on a resolution in disapproval of this Citizens Initiative Petition.  Thanks to Beverly Martin of Missouri Fair Tax for the ‘heads up’.

The average New Bloomfield ACT score in 2011 was 19.90. Unimpressive (Read here). Perhaps they could work on meeting all 15 of the MSIP APR Measurements instead of just 12.

It seems that the School Board of New Bloomfield would better serve their constituents by working to improve those scores… …instead of working to disapprove of a Citizens Initiative Petition. The Rockin’ Conservative asks you to contact the school to remind them to focus on improving the education they provide!

But, if they must, ask them if they have contacted the above proponents of the initiative to hear their side of the story.  Or, are they making this vote without all the facts?  Ask them, considering that State Auditor Tom Schweich won’t even weigh in, how did they come to the conclusion that they should disapprove of the initiative!

The phone number at the school is 573-491-3700.

The School Board will meet to vote TONIGHT!

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on November 17, 2011 in Education, Reform, Taxes

 

Tags: , , , , , ,

Jason Crowell: Special Session??? – Part 3

By Missouri State Senator Jason Crowell (jcrowell@senate.mo.gov)

(Read Part 1 Here)

(Read Part 2 Here)

Low Income Housing Tax Credits

Over the last few weeks, there has been a lot of discussion from Jefferson City politicians suggesting the General Assembly will be called back into a special legislative session focused on “economic development.”  In fact, Senate and House leadership have spent much of July in a backroom in St. Louis cutting a deal that is short on economic development and short on tax credit reform, but long on government handouts to campaign donors and special interests in the name of “economic development” and “job growth.”  The General Assembly usually meets January through May, but for extraordinary reasons, the Governor or General Assembly can call itself into session to pass what it deems as legislation that cannot wait until January.

Senate and House leadership have recently announced a deal they cut behind closed doors in a non-transparent inside job, which is now being pushed to be passed in a special session.  This back-room deal must not be allowed to pass.  But let me be clear, there is a path to do right by the Missouri taxpayer, but it will take you demanding that Jefferson City politicians put you first instead of their fat cat campaign donors.  It is my hope that together we are successful.

In this series we are discussing where we are as to a possible special session, what is wrong with Leaderships’ back-room deal, what special interest provisions must be eliminated and how we move forward with an economic development bill that puts Missouri first, not connected special interests and lobbyists.  There are several issues at play; two weeks ago we discussed Aerotropolis tax credits for St. Louis Lambert Airport and last week we discussed Historic Preservation tax credits.  This still leaves Low Income Housing tax credits, Brownfield tax credits, Land Assemblage tax credits, and Circuit Breaker Property Tax Relief tax credits for owners and renters of real property.  We will discuss all of these issues and the changes that must be made to Leaderships’ backroom deal.  You will probably learn more then you want to know, but it is vital that you know what is going on with your hard-earned tax dollars in Jefferson City.

The next issue to look at is Low Income Housing tax credits.  In my opinion, for the most part, state tax credits in Missouri have become programs that favor special interests and wealthy developers who are generous to politicians’ campaigns.  And these special interests are well represented in the halls of the Capitol by lobbyists who continue to convince legislators that tax credits create jobs or enhance economic development when all they really do is line the pockets of their beneficiaries.  And as the influence of these special interests have grown, so too has the expansion of many tax credit programs.  In total, Missouri tax credits have increased over the last 13 years by 430.9 percent, equaling $545 million in 2011.  For Fiscal Year 2012, budget experts estimate the number of tax credits will grow to $639 million.

Low Income Housing tax credits were the largest giveaway in FY 2011 of Missouri’s sky rocking tax credits.  It is so large, Missouri ranks number 2 in the nation for giveaways in the name of building low income.  This is how the Low Income Housing tax credit scheme works; once approved by the Missouri Housing Development Commission (MHDC), Missouri provides a tax credit which can be used each year for 10 years by its allocated developers, to construct or acquire and rehabilitate rental housing.  In 2011, Missouri issued $156 million worth of tax credits to developers for affordable housing.  But Low Income Housing tax credits are streamed to the developer over 10 years, so taxpayers have actually been left to-date with an outstanding unfunded Low Incoming Housing tax credit liability (authorized or issued yet not redeemed) of $1.369 billion.  For example, stretched over 10 years, a developer who received $1 million in Low Incoming Housing tax credits this year is actually receiving $10 million at $1 million per year over the course of 10 years.  So in this case after already receiving $1 million from the taxpayers this year, the taxpayers are still on the hook for the remaining $9 million due to the developer over the next 9 years.

Above, I believe he meant “in the name of building low income housing”

To finance these housing units, the developer takes the tax credits and sells them for cash.  These tax credits DO NOT reduce a developer’s tax liability; they are “cash” vouchers, which the developer sells to others at a great discount.  This is why in a 2008 audit, the Missouri Auditor called Low Income Housing tax credits “costly” and “inefficient” because only 35 cents for every dollar go to development costs while the remaining 65 cents go to investors.  Leaderships’ bill does nothing address this fact.  Instead, Leaderships’ bill creates even more exceptions so that investors benefit first before a return on investment is realized for taxpayers.

In the same report, the Auditor also criticized the selection process of not documenting how projects are selected; highlighting that political influence impacts the selection of projects.  The Leaderships’ bill instead of reforming this process will give more influence to special interest developers and campaign contributors by allowing both the President Pro Tem and Speaker of the House the ability to appoint, without a confirmation process, members to the board that decides who receives Low Income Housing tax credits.  In addition, the law if passed will allow politicians to put those with conflicts of interest on this board because there are no conflict of interest provisions to prevent campaign contributors from buying their way onto this board.

Leaderships’ bill also boasts the establishment of new caps.  But the truth is there is no savings because of caps.  Tax credit expenses will actually be higher in the future than they were in 2011 because with the new board, they spend more than in 2011.  With a new board that will have no accountability measure for their spending, the result will be greater wasteful spending of your hard earned tax dollars.  The crony capitalism of this new board will cost taxpayers even more than they are paying now for this wasteful program and that is by design.

Let me provide you with recent abuses of this program that the Leaderships’ bill does nothing to reform and in fact, increase the outrageous amount of tax credits issued:

  • Schultz School Senior Housing project in Cape Girardeau used state Low Income Housing tax credits to rehabilitate 45 housing units.  The developer received $372,997 per unit.
  • Bethel Ridge Estates in Columbia received $320,476 per unit to rehabilitate 42 units and then was awarded another $339,588 per unit to rehabilitate another 42 units for Bethel Ridge Estates II.
  • Sycamore Village Apartments in Perryville received $207,500 per unit to rehabilitate 36 units.
  • Cape Riverview Apartments 2 in Cape Girardeau received $196,047 per unit to rehabilitate 43 units
  • Breezeway Estates in Perryville received $253,333 per unit to rehabilitate 15 units
  • West Court Manor in Cape Girardeau received $205,917 per unit to rehabilitate 48 units
  • Eagles Landing in East Prairie received $116,000 per unit to rehabilitate 30 units.

I believe now is the time to make fundamental positive reforms to Low Income Housing tax credits.  We should subject awarding tax credits to a transparent process, where your representatives will have the chance to look at all the things we spend your tax dollars on and prioritize accordingly.  In Missouri, the method by which we set Missouri’s priorities through the appropriation process where we ask each of the state’s expenses to stand in line before your representatives in the General Assembly; requiring them to demonstrate why, with limited resources, they should be funded over others.  By making tax credits subject to the appropriations process, all state expenditures would now stand in line and prevent favorites, by allowing those who receive tax credits to cut to the front of the appropriations line.

Again I ask, is there a State Senator out there willing to let ‘Leadership’ know that she or he will filibuster this Aerotropolis boondoggle along with any bill that takes more money from the Missouri taxpayer and gives it to wealthy campaign donors.  If this monstrosity is the main item on the docket, it is incumbent on representatives that considers themselves fiscally responsible to stand firmly in the path of its passage.

And, will Governor Jay Nixon let the Legislature know that he will veto such legislation, or will he further line the pockets of his donors.

As you know, I have concerns with awarding any new tax credits while cutting education budgets in Missouri.  As conceived by Senate and House leadership, Low Income Housing tax credits are a special interest giveaway to fat cat campaign donors.  But, if Low Income Housing tax credits are going to be about true economic development, we must make the changes we’ve discussed.  And if Senate and House leadership fight us and fight the elimination of these special interest provisions, then they must be defeated as well.

Now is the time for government to live within its means, not spend money it does not have by authorizing giveaway tax credits not tied to performance.  Together we have an opportunity to do right by the Missouri taxpayer but it will take you, the bosses of the politicians, to demand the right legislation is passed, if there is a special session.  This can be done by taking back our state government and holding Senate and House leadership accountable; shining a bright light on the problems with their back-room deal and watching them scatter like cockroaches from their current position.  Again, I need your help holding these politicians accountable.  They are counting on your silence.  In the coming weeks we will examine further the issues and changes needed for a taxpayer first special session.

As always, I appreciate hearing your comments, opinions, and concerns.  Please feel free to contact me in Jefferson City at (573) 751-2459.  You may write to me at Jason Crowell; Missouri Senate; State Capitol; Jefferson City, MO  65101, or e-mail me at: jcrowell@senate.mo.gov or visit me on the web at http://www.senate.mo.gov/crowell.

h/t senate.mo.gov

 
1 Comment

Posted by on August 21, 2011 in Education, Taxes

 

Tags: , ,

Education: How Tax Breaks Really Work

Below is a clear reminder of the fallacy of the Liberal thinking on tax breaks!  This should be taught every year at our nation’s high schools.

I haven’t seen this discussion of the progressive nature of the tax code recently, so I thought I’d post it again to refresh our collective memory:

Suppose that every day, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all ten comes to $100. If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this:

  • The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.
  • The fifth would pay $1.
  • The sixth would pay $3.
  • The seventh would pay $7.
  • The eighth would pay $12.
  • The ninth would pay $18.
  • The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59.

So, that’s what they decided to do. The ten men drank in the bar every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement, until one day, the owner threw them a curve. ‘Since you are all such good customers, he said, ‘I’m going to reduce the cost of your daily beer by $20. Drinks for the ten now cost just $80.

The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes, so the first four men were unaffected.  They would still drink for free. But what about the other six men – the paying customers? How could they divide the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his ‘fair share?’ They realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if they subtracted that from everybody’s share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would each end up being paid to drink his beer. So, the bar owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man’s bill by roughly the same amount, and he proceeded to work out the amounts each should pay.

And so:

  • The fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% savings)
  • The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33%savings).
  • The seventh now pay $5 instead of $7 (28%savings).
  • The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% savings).
  • The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% savings).
  • The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% savings).

Each of the six was better off than before. And the first four continued to drink for free. But once outside the restaurant the men began to compare their savings.

“I only got a dollar out of the $20,” declared the sixth man. He pointed to the tenth man, “But he got $10!”

“Yeah, that’s right!!” exclaimed the fifth man. “I only saved a dollar, too. It’s unfair that he got ten times more than I!”

“That’s true!!” shouted the seventh man. “Why should he get $10 back when I got only two? The wealthy get all the breaks!”

“Wait a minute!” yelled the first four men in unison. “We didn’t get anything at all. The system exploits the poor!”

The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up. The next night the tenth man didn’t show up for drinks, so the nine sat down and had beers without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important. They didn’t have enough money between all of them for even half of the bill!

And that, boys and girls, journalists and college professors, is how our tax system works. The people who pay the highest taxes get the most benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up anymore. In fact, they might start drinking overseas where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.

I wonder if the education given above appears in any of our State sponsored high school textbooks?  Is it described in Race To The Top?  Common Core Standards?

Or, do they continue to teach the Obama mantra of:

 
1 Comment

Posted by on July 26, 2011 in Education, Taxes

 

Tags: , , ,

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 3,159 other followers